Eighty
percent of employee turnover is avoidable
You
want employees who are dependable, have great business attitude and
perfect job match! In 1998, absenteeism cost employers $757 per employee,
according to a report in USA TODAY. This was the direct cost reported
by a survey of human resource professionals and does not include the
cost of hiring others or paying overtime to perform the work of absent
employees.
You
can be held liable for employees' behavior on and off the job
You must know
the nature of the people you hire because their criminal behavior
could cost your business millions of dollars. Every time you
hire without practicing due diligence, you may be accepting liability
for their actions - even when they are "off the clock."
why assessments
menu | solutions | contact Janus
You
can be sued for illegal discrimination
In the absence of objective data, how can you demonstrate a hiring/promotion
decision was made objectively, without discrimination because of gender, race,
religion, etc.?
why assessments menu | solutions | contact
Janus
Résumé writers
write great fiction
In a survey of recent college graduates, 95% said they would
be willing to make a false statement in their résumés
in order to get a job. Forty-one percent admitted they had
already done so, according to a report
in Nation's Business (May, 1999).
why assessments menu | solutions | contact
Janus
Testing
is acceptable, even expected
As reported in Molding Systems (May, 1999, v57 i5 p56(1)), a survey found that
92% of job applicants accept testing as part of the job qualification process.
Only 3% resent it, while 5% were neutral.
why assessments menu | solutions | contact
Janus
Assessments
offer a solution
Historically, employers depend upon résumés, references and interviews
as sources of information for making hiring decisions. In practice, these sources
have proved inadequate for consistently selecting good employees. When training
employees, a "one size fits all" approach has failed to provide the
desired results. When selecting people for promotion, otherwise excellent employees
have too often been miscast into roles they could not perform satisfactorily.
Clearly, an essential ingredient for making "people decisions" has
been missing from the formula.
why assessments menu | solutions | contact
Janus
The
use of assessments has become essential to employers who:
- want to put
the right people into jobs;
- provide employees
with effective training;
- help their
managers to become more effective; and
- promote people
into positions where they will succeed.
The use of assessments
has resulted in extraordinary increases in productivity while reducing
employee relations problems, employee turnover, stress, tension,
conflict and overall human resources expenses. Several factors
contribute to the failure of traditional hiring methods.
Résumés
often contain false claims of education and experience while omitting
information that would help employers make better hiring decisions.
Business references are of little value because most past-employers
will tell you nothing but "name, rank and serial number." These
realities are the reason interviews have become the most influential
factor in hiring and promotion decisions.
However, experience
shows only a coincidental correlation between the ability to deliver
well in an interview and to deliver well on the job. Studies peg
this correlation at 14% -- one good employee in every seven hires.
Even background checks don't help much. The success rate becomes
26%, but that's only one good hire in every four.
Unfortunately,
many employers have accepted these poor results and the high cost
of excessive turnover as a business reality. They have flown the
white flag of surrender.
why assessments
menu | solutions | contact
Janus
Don't
Surrender! Assessments do help significantly
Assessing
behavioral traits improved the hiring success rate to 38%.
When both thinking abilities and behavioral traits are assessed,
the right people are
hired 54% of the time. When an assessment of occupational interests is added,
successful results improve to 66%. The most impressive results are achieved,
however, when an integrated assessment is used - one that measures behavioral
traits, thinking, occupational interests, plus "Job Match."
These
integrated assessments employ cutting-edge technology and empirical
data to
assess the qualities of "The Total Person." In doing
so, the individual qualities of candidates are compared to the
qualities of employees who performing their duties in a superior
manner. These 21st Century assessments successfully identify
potentially excellent employees better than 75% of the time.
why assessments
menu | solutions | contact
Janus
Job
Match outranks all other factors
A
well-documented study, published in Harvard Business Review
concludes that "Job
Match" is by far the most reliable predictor of effectiveness on the job.
The study considered many factors including the age, sex, race, education and
experience of approximately 300,000 subjects. It evaluated their job performance
and found no significant statistical differences, except in the area of "Job
Match."
The
conclusion: "It's
not experience that counts or college degrees or other accepted
factors; success hinges on a fit with the job." The only reliable
method for evaluating "Job Match" is with a properly
designed assessment instrument, capable of measuring the essential
job-related characteristics particular to each specific job.
Profiles International has assessments designed for this purpose.
why assessments menu | solutions | contact
Janus
why assessments
menu | solutions | contact
Janus
|